Wednesday, 7 May 2014

Sales Matters in EdTech: Evangelists

In my first "Sales Matters in EdTech" post I questioned the impact education had by treating sales separately from other business functions like business administration, marketing, economics etc and by ignoring successful sales organisation like Dale Carnegie. Today I am going to explore Evangelism... both sales and religious variety. 
  • Ever wonder what the very first sale in the history of man was? Is the "sale" as old as humanity?
  • Ever wonder why we call the early adopters and fans of a particular brand Evangelists?
Whats that? Never talk about sales and religion?

No I am not trying to court controversy... indeed the issue of comparing religious figures to salespeople, or Apple as a religion is way too hot for me to handle! Therefore all I am going to do in this post is provide 3 extracts from Philip Delves Broughton's book "Life's a Pitch" (US: The Art of the Sale).
I'm not sure how many educators will have read this book, but as Steve Johnston highlights in "Where Ideas Come From," ideas are the result of "slow hunches" which come from diverse sources... This book has provided me with some "Eureka moments" one of which I will pick up on in my next post which I have got from reading the (potentially controversial) extracts below.

In the Beginning...The Apple and the Snake
A sale made us human. Before that sale, Adam and Eve lived in the garden of Eden, blessed by God, naked, joyful, surrounded by abundant food and beauty. Just one thing, God said. Do not eat from the tree of knowledge. If you do, he warned, you will die. The threat could not have been much clearer. then along came the serpent, "More subtle than any beast of the field," to persuade the man and woman to do the one thing they fear will surely kill them. 

The serpent at this point was not the slithering creature of today but a walking, talking biped. Its purpose was to destroy the prefect equilibrium of Eden. To do away with Adam and get its scaly mitts on Eve. It did so by turning the threat of severe punishment to its advantage. How terrific must that tree be it said to Eve, for God to make such a threat? And by the way, did he threaten you? Or just Adam? Suddenly, Eve is reeling. Well, yes, she stumbles, I suppose God did only tell Adam. Then, the Serpent asks, why do you think God is so determined for you not to eat of the tree of knowledge? Because he doesn't want you knowing good and evil like he does. He doesn't want any other Gods around the place. 

So go on, take a bite. Won't hurt you. Might even do you some good. Disaster. Eve tastes the fruit and persuades Adam to do the same. They are banished from the garden, clothed in animal skins, and forced to work the earth for food until the dreadful day when to dust they shall return. Easeful immortality forsaken for a bite of apple. But from a sales perspective, one has to admire the serpents hustle. No longer did Eve regard the tree as deadly, but rather as the attractive bearer of tasty fruit, which had the additional effect of making her wise. The serpent was a master of the one-off sale.(Life's a Pich P9 & 10)

Selling Religion
In 1923 sociologist Thorstein Vablen wrote that commercial salesmanship had its roots in evangelism. He called the Roman Catholic Church "Quite the largest, oldest most magnificent, most unabashed, most lucrative enterprise in sales-publicity in all Christendom." In 19th Century America, organisaed armies of salespeople were sent out to sell books and other products, replacing independent peddlers. These new sales forces were organised using the model of Methodist and other proselytizing religious groups that abounded in the country at the time. The instructions to salespeople retained an evangelical flavour, emphasizing the importance of faith and a sense of duty in overcoming the loneliness and many rejections on the road. Asa Candler, who turned Coca-Cola into a major enterprise in the late 19th Century, was a devout Methodist who would lead his salesmen in singing "Onward, Christian Soldiers." He was also vice president of the American Bible Society, one of the most successful door-to-door sales organisations ever.


In 1925, Bruce Barton, an advertising executive and the son of a Congregational minister, fused selling and religion in his book "The Man Nobody Knows," in which he depicted Jesus Christ as a heroically successful salesman. "Let us not forget all creed for the time being, and take the story just as simple as the narrative gives it... a poor boy growing up in a peasant family, working in a carpenter shop, gradually feeling his powers expanding, beginning to have an influence over his neighbours, recruiting a few followers, suffering disappointments and reverses, finally death. Yet building so solidly and well that death was only the beginning of his influence!" He listed 3 reasons for Christs success as a salesman.

1) He had a magnetic voice and manner, supported by an "overwhelming sincerity"
2) He hired well, he recognising the hidden talents in the ragtag group who became his disciples 
3) He possessed "unending patience" which he used to train his organisation. He was empathetic, but had enough resolve to succeed.

Because of his marvelous instinct for discovering their latent powers, and because of his unwavering faith and patience, he molded them into an organisation which carried on victoriously"

Barton was widely lampooned for his brazen conflation of sales and the sacred, but his book sold 750,000 copies and propelled him to a seat in congress. (Life's a Pitch P102-105)

The Miracle of Sales Evangelists
To this day many direct selling companies hew closely to religious organisation and rhetoric. Mary Kay lists its priorities as God first, family second, career third, as it flogs its salespeople to move more inventory. The Southwestern Company, which employs fleets of college students to sell textbooks door to door over their summer breaks, used prayer and religion to help their salespeople accept rejection and to persevere. Omnilife a direct seller of health products, host recruitment events at which audience members come on stage and testify to the products' miraculous powers. Tupperware used to "baptize" its top distributors at an artificial lake Poly Pond at its headquarters in Florida.

Apple is more subtle than this but, in essential ways, no different. 


When people talk of Apple as a cult, they are referring in part to the slavish abandonment of self to a cause of questionable value.

Apple thinks and behaves like many of history's greatest evangelical organisations. It was founded and was run for many years by a highly charismatic leader, who refered to his own achievements as "magical" and "revolutionary." Its advertising describes its products as possessing miraculous powers. A video celebrating the first year of the Ipad featured a mother of an autistic child saying, "I define a miracle as something that comes in and changes your life for the better in ways you did not expect." The miracle was the iPad and her son's enthusiastic engagement with it. In the same film, Ron Johnson, who oversaw Apple's stores at the same time, says, "The iPad has to be held, has to be touched to truly understand how magical it is" - as if it were the Turin Shroud.

Apple's Stores act as churches, dedicated spaces for gathering the faithful and attracting new converts. When Apple was planning its first stores, in 2000-2001, it emphasised the importance of putting them in central, urban locations to attract passersby, and letting visitors use the products. The company's intention was to increase the number of "switchers," people ready to abandon their PC's to become Apple users. 

The difficulty of converting millions to Apple demanded soaring spaces, latter day cathedrals like Apple's glass cube on 5th Avenue, and a selling method akin to missionary work. The stores were laid out with the new products up front, so customers who had never owned an Apple product could try them out; next was a Red Zone, abuzz with staff and energy, where the conversation could take place in the form of a sale; and then finally the Family room, where customers would be called by name and helped with service, support and lessons. As Johnson said of the stores, "We invest here to build promoters for Apple," fresh armies of consumer evangelists who can go out and preach Apple's gospel. 

The symbol Johnson used to describe the earliest days of the Apple stores was an Evian bottle, because the company gave out 3,000 of them to people waiting in line for the first Apple store to open. The first Genius Bar gave away water to connect with customers, to show Apple cared. at a time when its rivals were trying to sell $2,000 computers in soulless big-box stores using cutthroat sales tactics, Apple went in the opposite direction. Johnson said that while others were hiring sharks to sell PCs, Apple sought "Not sharks, but...teachers, photographers and filmmakers," converts themselves who sold out of enthusiasm, not commission. 

Today, school groups can book Apple stores for night and summer camps held for children to spent time learning about technology. Visit an Apple store day or night in many locations, and you realise it has become a secular church hall.

The most favourable interpretation of Apples sales tactics is that they reflect a genuine desire to improve the lives of their customers. An iPad can be a wonderful thing, just as miraculous and transformational as the evangelists claim. The ugly interpretation is that the company is exploiting its customers desire for meaning, significant, belonging and inspiration for commercial ends, with no concern for its adherents beyond what they are willing to spend. As an Apple customer milling through the stores, I've felt both sensations myself, that of exhilarated devotee and powerless commercial mark.

Apple delivers goods with real benefits. But the essence of its pitch is about more than touch screens and processing speed. [As we have seen] It goes back centuries. (Life's a Pitch Page 100-102)   

I hope you have found these extracts enlightening (No pun intented). Keep an eye out for my follow up post to this to see how I feel that educators and EdTech could use some of the examples from this book with Tech integration and roll out. If you are involved work in EdTech you really should have this book on your bookshelf. Educators might even benefit from it too. 

Tuesday, 6 May 2014

Sales Matters in EdTech: Influencing the "Influencers"

Last night I joined the inaugural Social Selling Hour Twitter Chat (#sshour) and anyone who takes a dim view on sales people really should check this Twitter Stream... Technology is not only disrupting the sales of books with Amazon, it is also disrupting the people involved with sales... Social Media is disrupting this profession the same as it is with any other industry.

Before joining #sshour I also blogged about the session, where I spoke highly about people I have learned an awful lot from. After publishing this post something crossed my mind... Is this post open to people questioning my motivation? Was I trying to "Influence the influencers?" 

Reaching Out to Influencers
The reason for thinking about this is because this very topic created some animated discussion on Friday's #Cmgrhangout: Community 101. The following question was raised by moderator Jonathan Brewer (@Houseofbrew); 

How do you reach out to Influencers? "Your boss has told you to reach out to influencers and advocates. Help! What you do? How to you go about achieving this?"

Here's some of the views from Maya Paveza (@mayapaveza), David DeWald (@Historian) & Brian Fanzo (@isocial_Fanz)

Maya: "Now hold on you can't just reach out and make 'an ask' you have to contribute to your community you have to give to people, you have to build relationships and have trust before you EVER go for 'an ask' ... if you do that people will go running in the other direction" 

David: Touched on the nature and intent of why people were reaching out to influencers "If it's gratitude then, that's a fine reach out"

Maya: "If you are told to "Reach out to influencers" then a favour is implied"

Brian: "We need to rephrase the question, we need to ask what can we give the influencer? Give them something of value" 

Maya: "You're going to have a solid relationship and a great product so you won't need to ask. If you've got the relationship they're gonna promote you any way" She went on to say "There are so many people out there who are appearing to be altruistic and giving to communities... but are really thinking about 'what's in it for me, then there are others who just giving without asking for anything" 

Brian: "Your personal brand should be about who you are and that should stand out"

Takers, Matchers & Givers
Would anyone think that I am using flattery to try ingratiate myself with the influencers that I wrote about... Especially as the reason for my "Being social" post might be seen as taking Brian's advice of "What can I do for this influencer?" in the #cmgrhangout forum, and apply it by blogging about a new forum he was establishing. Not exactly "subtle," I know, but I bet it's the kind of 'reach out' that influencers will get from time to time.

I think the discussion between Maya, David and Brian were great examples of how people's motivations impact on the way they go about building their networks;

"Most people operate as either takers, matchers, or givers. Whereas takers strive to get as much as possible from others and matchers aim to trade evenly... givers are the rare breed of people who contribute to others without expecting anything in return" Adam Grant Give and Take

Grant goes on to explain what makes the givers networking efforts different by introducing us to Adam Rifkin who, in 2011 had more LinkedIn connections to the 640 powerful people on Fortunes lists than any other human being on the planet. Grant explains that the secret to Rifkins' success is that; 

"He gives a lot more than he receives. It's part of his mantra to be helpful. This exemplifies how givers tend to approach networks and stands in stark contrast to the way that takers and matchers tend to build and extract value from their connections... Takers and matchers tend to give strategically, with an expected personal return that exceeds or equals their contributions. When takers and matchers network, they tend to focus on who can help them in the near future, and this dictates what, where, and how they give"

All 3 of these groups are touched upon in the #Cmgrhangout and wanted to explore these in the context of me praising Brian Fanzo, Alice Myerhoff (@motodot) and Rachel Miller (@rachelloumiller)

I am very much a learner with these issues, but everyone has to start somewhere... at the very least I'm making an attempt to explore social media, community management and social selling. There has not been any strategy or method for "reaching out to influencers." Any outreach has been attempt to "Get Social." 

As well as dispelling any suggestion that I was blogging to engage with influencers, I want to reiterate the advice from #Cmgrhangout and encourage newbies to follow their advice... It's certainly working out OK for this newbie.    

Maya: Build Relationships 
I have joined #Cmgrhangout most weeks since "Community Managers Awareness Day" and have followed Brian on Social Media as, like many Community Managers, he is very generous with his time and has lots of great advice... The reason for singling Brian out was because I have followed 3 communities that he's recommended. 

While Alice is new to EdSurge, I am a huge fan! I am so impressed with what EdSurge has achieved in the 3 years since the company was established. My reasons for this are covered on the last page of my EdTech report. I keep in touch with my EdSurge contacts to let them know about any crazy ideas I'm exploring.

I didn't mention Rachel as much as I should have in my "Being Social" post but with her it's not a case of reaching out to influencers, it's the way she reaches out to anyone she comes into contact with... Go send her a Tweet and see what happens.

David: Reach out with Gratitude
I am extremely grateful for the fact that EdSurge provide such great quality EdTech coverage, and have been instrumental in closing some of the divisions that exist between educators and EdTech companies. 
The least I could do was highlight that the new VP of Sales has written a book in an area that is of interest to me, and which could help close this gap further if more EdTech people were to read it.

Brian is involved with so many online forums where he freely gives up his time and the benefit of his extensive experience, the least I could do was to highlight that there was a new chat session... especially as, again, this is an area that I'm focusing on with my "Sales Matters" posts 

Maya: Do me a Favour!
While I may have "reached out" to influencers this has usually been to say thank you. These groups and people have taught me so much about community engagement, expressing gratitude is just plain good manners... As is not asking for a favour. Here we have a group of people who are giving up their time to share their hard earned expertise free of charge. What more should you expect? Instead of asking for a favour, stop and think about how much of a favour these influencers are doing by not charging you for their advice!

Brian: How Can you Help? 
Adam Grant's book had a huge impact on me and I try to help wherever I can. This includes working on trying to change people's perceptions about sales in EdTech and this post was very much in line with his advice of;

"Your personal brand should be about who you are and that should stand out"

Any attempt to "reach out influencers" was consistent with what I have been working on for the last 14 months. Everyone likes win-win situations. With thousands of EdTech companies all contacting the same education clients I am a big fan of the 5 minute favour and Reciprocity Rings.

I saw an opportunity to give a shout out to EdSurge's new(ish) VP of sales book this allowed me to highlight  --> the area of expertise that Brian & Rachel's new Twitter chat which --> could help EdTech sales teams who are struggling to understand the changes in sales and social selling leads to --> improved engagement with customers leads to better --> understanding, collaboration and co-creation. 

Being Likeable... Always Show your Friendship First
The reason that I got Adam Grant's book was because it sounded an awful lot like an article I read last year by Dave Kerpen called Always Show your Friendship First. This also had a big impact on me and Give and Take mirrored this message.

I'll leave you with the wisdom of a "shy, Star Trek loving, anagram obsessing software geek...Oh and he also happens to be the most connected person on the planet;

"I want to improve the world and, and I want to smell good doing it" Adam Rifkin Motto.

"My network developed little by little, in fact a little every day through small acts of kindness, over the course of many years, with the desire to make better the lives of the people I'm connected to... When you have nothing, what's the first thing you try to do? You try to make a connection and have a relationship that gives you an opportunity to do something for someone else" Adam Rifkin via Give and Take.

Monday, 5 May 2014

Sales Matters in EdTech: Being Social

Embedded image permalink
This series of "Sales Matters" posts has come about as I wanted to participate in some of the PD inititives that are currently taking place in EdTech. Today I want to discuss an area that I am not too qualified in... but it sure is a big area with my own Professional Development which is: Being Social.

Selling Change & PD to Salespeople
But it's OK that I've not much experience here because, as Jerry Blumengarten suggests;
The sales process is changing. It's changing so much that some inbound Marketing experts predict that cold calling will be a thing of the past in 3-5 years... great news for people who don't like being interrupted with unsolicited calls; but not so good for a profession which according to Philip Delves Broughton;

"[Sales] is the single largest function in business. Millions more are employed in sales jobs in America than in manufacturing, let alone marketing, strategy, finance, or any other business function"

 What are the implications to with any changes in the sales process for any organisations and individual sales people who don't re-skill? Ask HubSpot.
Inbound: PD for Sales People

Creative Disruption
In my "Ineffective EdTech" post I highlighted that anyone can be susceptible to blind spots. Is the sales process an example of this in EdTech? We hear EdTech companies talking about how "inefficient" education is, how it's not kept up with the pace of change with technology etc... but; 

Have EdTech companies spotted any inefficiencies with their sales efforts? 

Have Sales Directors kept up with the pace of change with technology & sales? 
Companies: Get Social!
Race to the Bottom
Whether educator, student, sales person, in fact everyone everywhere needs to read Seth Godin's Linchpin and listen to his views on the economy at the moment and the future of employment. This is perhaps more important for students and sales people given how saturated the job market is, and how competitive things are likely to get. If you don't have time to read this book then here is a video where he explains why we are in a "Race to the Bottom"  

Thank Goodness for Social Media and my PLN!
I am extremely fortunate to have found the people I have to help me appreciate some of these changes. There are too many people to thank here, but I am grateful to each and every person who has spent time with me to provide the benefit of their experiences.

Whether through a book, a chance encounter, at conferences & workshops, one-off interactions on Social Media or through regular discussions with my PLN in Twitter chats... THANK YOU! (I've detailed my journey in "One Small Click for a Digital Immigrant"). 

PD in EdTech Sales is easy - Social Listening 
"Ask 100 successful salespeople the secret of their work, and 95 will say "listening." Listening is selling's golden rule. It's about what the customer whats, not what you have. Life's a Pitch

This is probably the single greatest thing I get out of joining the edchats that I join regularly (#EdTechChat, #EdTechBridge and #ukfechat). This is also the reason I collate and trawl through the Twitter data from conferences... and why #EdChatModerator is still on my radar - there are so many great ideas are confined to a fragmented EdChat archive system. 

I knew that "Inbound Marketing" was the future before #EdTechChat was established but, after following the chat in the first 6 weeks, I saw the extent to which a quiet revolution was taking place in the edchat space: 40 EdTech companies were mentioned 400 times in the chats... and the companies were not even present! 

This was a year ago and Educators selling through word of mouth is really gaining traction. I could tell you how, but I'm not going to... Everything I've learned has been from following Twitter EdChats. So, if you are in EdTech sales, go join some EdChat and lurk, listen and learn. 

What Educators Want
While Philip Delves Broughton advocates listening to customers and catering to their needs, he highlights that the very idea is something of a contradiction. 

Have your customer's interests at heart and you can sell him/her anything. But contained in this advice is one of the biggest challenges in sales: How can you realistically claim to be serving a customer's best interests when at least half your brain is calculating how to extract the most money possible for what you are providing? 

The simplest response is just to say you have a product that serves your customers best interests... but this is rarely the case. Few salesman can honestly say that what they sell is an upgrade to their customer's life, rather than a means to the salesman's own enrichment" Life's a Pitch

Now take a look at this statement and think of an organisation that is changing the landscape of EdTech? Sorry no prizes for guessing the answer, because it's obvious. Now compare EdSurge's Vice President of Sales Tweet below with the comment above;

Alice joined #EdTechBridge on Wednesday and saw on her profile that she was an author and checked out the name of the book Alice wrote, which is Social Media for Sales People. What?! The Vice President of Sales for an organisation that is universally admired by both educators and EdTech startups has written a book about the future of sales! Wonder how many EdTech companies have got copies of this for their staff? This went straight to on the top of my book list!  

Mixing with Different Tribes... Social Selling
If you check the #socialselling hashtag you will notice that Alice has written some really interesting articles and has experience in a number of industries. An well as being established author on sales, she also contributes to the SalesForce blog... which is an extremely social company. 


In the "Managing a Tech Community" #Cmgrhangout Salesforce's Community Manager, April Kyle Nassi (@thisisnotapril) discusses this. One of the reasons I enjoy #Cmgrhangout is because of the different sectors that people work in, but come together through the shared interest of building communities by being sociable... This is how I have met lots of remarkably social people... including; 

Cometh the Social Selling Hour... Cometh the Social Selling Man?
I've met so many fantastic people through #Cmgrhangout and other #Cmgr forums, but there is someone that I need to give a special social shout out to, and here's why: Go take a look at Brian Fanzo's Twitter account (@isocial_fanz) and;

1) Don't look at his Twitter profile (If possible)
2) Check out his Twitter stream
3) Try to find out what he does for a living based on his Tweets, then
4) Check out how influential he is in his communities (and he's involved with lots of them!)

 I've never seen any "sales Tweets" for any of the services that he works for. The only thing that I've seen him advocating on any social media platforms are the tools that he recommends because he likes using them.

But here's the thing... if I'm ever in the market for what his company does, I know the first company I'll be going to... And I won't need to be "sold," I'll be buying. Brian's personal touch has done all the selling through giving up his time to providing great advice and building a relationship.
I want to know more about how Brian, Rachel Miller (@rachelloumiller) and others have managed this so effectively, which is why I pay close attention to the chats that these people involved with;
  • I joined #Tchat for the first time last week, which focuses on organisational culture (Wednesdays at 7pm ET/12am GMT). 
  • Social Selling Hour (#SSHour) the inaugural chat is today at 4pm ET/9pm GMT)
I'll be attending this session to listen to the experts from various industries to get some tips about engaging and ethical sales... I wonder if many other EdTech sales and marketing people will be joining me?



Saturday, 3 May 2014

Sales Matters in EdTech: Ineffective Tech

In my first EdTech "Sales Matters" post I tried to "re-orientate" educators about some of the reasons there is negativity around the sales people. While some of this negativity can be perceived, it is also the result of being sold ineffective tech. It's a week since the "Teachers Know Best" report was published and out of the 940 Tech tools that educators mentioned in the report;

50% of the EdTech was seen as INEFFECTIVE!

Today I want to explore some of the reasons that ineffective Tech can be developed, and how it makes its way into the classroom... After all there are numerous people within a school and EdTech company that are involved with the development and procurement of the tech. Is this because of bad sales people, poorly developed Tech, the procurement process at the school, or is the issue with the company's CEO and the culture they establish?
If the EdTech community decide to be defensive about the Gates Foundations findings with comments like; "Yeah, but this is only a sample of 3,000 educators... it's hardly representative all educators" 

What about Gallops' findings where Director of Education, Brandon Busteed, highlighted in an Inside Higher Ed article: 

"At a national level, there is no evidence that educational technology has reduced the cost of education yet or improved the efficacy of education... Maybe there will be some day, but that's the question: How much longer do we think it will take before we can detect movement on the national needle?" 

Now these findings are surely a concern for all stakeholders involved with EdTech, whether developer, schools/district procurement department, educator or student. But what would happen if we were to take any ineffective tech out of this research and/or if 100% of EdTech was effective? Would the results of this research be different? You would have thought so... you'd certainly hope so!
This post explores some of the reasons bad EdTech might exist. It might be useful to start by highlighting Dave Feinleib's observation in his book, Why Startups Fail; 

"No one sets out to build a bad product, yet it happens all the time" 

His book explores why this happens and, with Feinleib's kind permission, I have taken his findings and applied them to education in our EdTech report. Jim Collins highlights that an early warning sign to look out for in any organisation that may be failing is hubris.

A Lesson in Self Awareness... From the Bottom of the Class 
I wonder how often educators have to arrange meetings with parents who want to talk about issues around "Why is my kid in the bottom set for english/maths" or any other subject. Sometimes this is not so much to find ways to support their kids development, but to demand that they get moved up. 

I have experienced this with my own kids as they were... erm... well not exactly "top of the class." But before marching into the school demanding answers, I called an educator friend to discuss the situation. I asked how I should handle this... Should I arrange a meeting with the teacher? Should I ask that my child get moved up? Or should I lay the blame of any poor performance on the educator's ability to teach. Lol. Here's the kind of advice I received;

"I spend so much time dealing with these types of enquires. Obviously every parent cares about their kid... they want what's best for them. Of course you want to support them in their studies and you hope that they do well in school... every parent wants their kids to be the top of the class. But William, someone's kid has to be at the bottom... why can't it be yours? What would you prefer, that they get moved up only for them to struggle, get left behind and lose confidence? Would you consider this supportive? ...Don't worry about it. Just keep practicing with them at home. It will all work out in the end"

"Doctor, Doctor... I'm having visions of Grandeur" 
Not only was this great advice and an important lesson for us as parents, but it was also a great lesson in self awareness for our kids about their strengths, weaknesses and the importance of preparation and doing your best... and about being honest with yourself about their abilities.

Compare this parental outlook with a University lecturer I know who has parents calling him and asking why their kids got a bad mark, I understand his answers are along the lines of "Because they handed in a poor assignment." Does this attitude have an impact in adulthood? In a study of Doctors at a hospital who were asked to self assess their performance with their colleagues. The results? Not a single Doctor rated themselves in the bottom 50th percentile.

Does the same thing happen in EdTech? Like it or not, someone in the Teachers Know Best research is developing inefficient EdTech;

Why can't it be the EdTech YOUR company develops? Would you know if it was? 

Delusional EdTech? 
How easy is it to spot our own short comings? Athletes who are at the top of their game have coaches to help build on their strengths, develop their weaker areas and to identify the "blind spots" that everyone is susceptible to. 

For business executives Marshal Goldsmiths book "What got you Here won't get you There" is dedicated to this topic. In "How the Mighty Fall" Jim Collins details the 5 stages of decline that failing organisation go through 

Stage 1: Hubris born of success
Stage 2: Undisciplined Pursuit for more
Stage 3: Denial of Risk & Peril
Stage 4: Grasping for Salvation
Stage 5: Capitulation to irrelevance or death

Stage 1: Hubris born of success 
Great enterprises can become insulated by success; accumulated momentum can carry an enterprise forward, for a while, even if its leaders make poor decisions or lose discipline. Stage 1 kicks in when people become arrogant, regarding success virtually as an entitlement, and they lose sight of the true underlying factors that created success in the first place"

Here's what one concerned executive asked after he heard Collins present his findings;

“When you are at the top of the world, the most powerful nation on Earth, the most successful company in your industry, the best player in your game, your very power and success might cover up the fact that you’re already on the path to decline. So, how would you know?” 


Collins goes on to highlight that every institution is vulnerable, no matter how great. No matter how much they’ve achieved, no matter how far they’ve gone, no matter how much power they’ve garnered, organisation are vulnerable to decline. There is no law of nature that the most powerful will inevitably remain at the top. Anyone can fall and most eventually do. 

Arrogance in EdTech
If any organisation is vulnerable to decline is there arrogance and hubris in EdTech?

The New York Times has been exploring the issue of Technology companies having strong "alpha male" cultures: Technologies Man Problem and GitHub Founder resigns after investigation 

Among the weaknesses that Alpha Males have which poses risks to their organisation are that: "They can be arrogant, stubborn, overly opinionated; imposes own views; closed to others' thinking" (Source: The Alpha Male Syndrome
Source: New York Times "Technologies Man Problem"
So, the technology sector may have some Alpha Male issues. Then there are senior managers' personalities that we need to consider. Would you want to partner with people who have the following character traits; pathological liar, cunning & manipulative, impulsive, irresponsible, fails to accept responsibility for their own actions, lack of realistic goals, a lack of empathy, grandiose sense of self worth.

These are some of the 20 signs of psychopath CEOsand Professor Kevin Dutton's research found that more psychopaths are CEOs than any other profession... Maybe it's cunning and manipulative CEOs that have played a role in giving sales the bad name that it has today? 
Channel 4 Psychopath Night
Are you now thinking the same thing as I am;

It makes you wonder that as much as 50% of EdTech is effective?  

Do They mean us?
I may be looking in the wrong places, but I have not seen much discussion from the EdTech community asking 
"Do you think the inefficient EdTech in this report includes us?" This is perhaps unsurprising as these are not the kind of discussions you might have in a public forum... although an open debate on the issue might be welcome by educators. 

Neither do the great EdTech providers need to ask this question because they KNOW they are doing good work. They know because they obsess about it, they go out of their way to establish great relationships with their clients.

These great providers can either pick up the phone to their customers and ask "Do you think this means us?" Equally, educators who work with these providers know that their input is valued and taken on board, so know to get in touch if they are not happy and/or if any issue needs resolved. These relationships lead to collaboration and co-creation of new ideas.
EdTech Collaborating with educators at EdSurge's Baltimore Summit
... And Would the Arrogant CEO Care?
But what about any arrogant alpha male (or psychopathic) CEOs in EdTech? (That is of course IF there are any in EdTech...) What if the founder/CEO's hubris and arrogance means that they develop ineffective EdTech, they would be less likely to ask their customers or employees for feedback? Indeed even if someone highlighted any inefficiencies, wouldn't they simply refuse to listen to any concerns?

Are these the kind of companies where the CEO and IT Director go into a meeting room for two hours and come out with a "game changing solution" in education and if the sales department asks "But doesn't XYZ product already do that?" They are told that they are being negative and "Are not being a team player," and get sent out to sell a bad idea. 

They are ridiculed in meetings with educators about how bad the idea is, and how other products do a similar (but better) job. They return to the office and their sales experience is called into question "Maybe it's not the product, maybe that you can't sell" is the retort, despite the fact that they have a proven track record in sales within the organisation.

The MD goes out and promises the earth on the functionality of the product despite it being nothing more than a drawing on a whiteboard, convinces a couple of clients who buy into "the vision." At worst the service is never developed, at best some limp half-baked project is delivered (late). Corners have been cut because of the financial pressures that a company in decline faces and the stress that everyone is under due to the internal strife.        

BillAuletCulture2How the Arrogant Fall
Going back to Jim Collins "stages of decline" I have worked at an organisation who went through each of these 5 stages over the space of a 12 month period. I sent the MD an email which highlighted that "I could see some of these signs of decline within the organisation." This was by no means an easy thing to do! But I cared a about the company and my colleagues, so felt it was necessary. 


As you can perhaps imagine, the response I got was not a good one! Nevertheless, the warning went unheeded and 12 months later the MD had to take the decision to close one of the offices because of a loss in revenue. 10-15 hard working, loyal members of staff were made redundant... all because of a failure to see the signs, or listen to colleagues. 

During the redundancy process I presented the e-mail highlighting the concerns I had 12 months ago. My MD said nothing, but when I shared the email with my colleagues they commented; 

"It's like the author of this book was sitting in the office watching all this unfold" 

This was not a pleasant thing to go through but, as is always the case for an optimistic realist, I am grateful for the experience. 

Culture is Everything

I now know what the early signs look like, so I'll know when an organisation is headed for trouble a lot sooner in the future. Indeed, I have a better idea about what to look for BEFORE getting involved. I had an interview with an EdTech company and I asked "What's the Culture like here?" The Managing Directors response was "We work hard and play hard!"  

"Is that it? That's the sum total of your description of your culture?" I thought to myself. Erm... thank you and goodbye! I have an idea of what culture is and what it is not... and this wasn't it!


Are there any arrogant EdTech companies who decide to ignore their customers and staff? I don't know how typical this is, but my 13 years experience in the industry suggests that there are. The knock on effect is that these companies' behaviour makes it hard for everyone. It was after watching Panorama: reading, writing and rip offs where educators lost their jobs as the result of unethical sales people that I decided to write my EdTech report.

This is obviously an extreme example but if organisations are not going to listen to educators when they become their customers, maybe educators need to inquire about the organisations' culture - as well as the EdTech - before buying their products. Maybe this will help improve the statistics with ineffective EdTech. 

"Until I came to IBM, I probably would have told you that culture was just one among several important elements in any organization's makeup and success — along with vision, strategy, marketing, financials, and the like... I came to see, in my time at IBM, that culture isn't just one aspect of the game, it is the game. In the end, an organization is nothing more than the collective capacity of its people to create value." Lou Grestner, Former IBM CEO 

If you want more of an example of just how much culture matters check out "Culture eats strategy for breakfast" as well as Talent Culture (@Talentculture#Tchat (Wednesdays 7pm ET/12am GMT.

I was doing some research on Go Boundless' website before joining thier new #TextBookRevolution Twitter Chat... it sure is good to know that there is EdTech like this around!

Thursday, 1 May 2014

Sales Matters in EdTech: PD Vs Intuitive Tech

Last night the topic of discussion at EdTechBridge was Professional Development (PD). As I mentioned in my first Sales Matters in EdTech post, that I wasn't sure if I would be able to contribute to this discussion.

Sure enough, last night I was a little quiet as I didn't have enough knowledge on the issue, so I "lurked and learned." What I learned from listening to the discussion leads me to ask;

Is it really the role of education to provide teachers professional development with EdTech?


EdTech Developers Role with PD
Of course every employer should care about the development of their staff... But what about the technology supplier? 

With regard to PD and EdTech can I do a quick straw poll with any educators reading this. Do you feel that more or less PD is needed with;

1) Technology that you are expected to use but find "clunky" and complicated, or
2) Your faviourite tech tools that you use in class?

My guess is that educators feel they need more PD with the technology they don't understand so well... DOH! Talk about stating the obvious! Bear with me a moment... At least while I ask a follow up question;


Isn't it the responsibility of the technology supplier to make sure their customers have the best user experience possible?

Even if you disagree that a Tech supplier has no role to play in PD, surely they are responsible for ensuring that their users are comfortable with the tech, and are benefiting from all the features and functionality... If for no other reason that it's in the companies best interest from a sales perspective!

Have you ever visited an Apple retail store? Did you see any of the workshops that were going on? Did it look more like a store or a classroom? Check out Assistant Superintendent, Thomas Troisi observations when he visited an Apple store "Our Children need the schools of tomorrow today
Or what about Amazon Kindle's "Mayday" response service? 


These are brands that know how to develop technology! They develop products that are intuitive, easy to use AND their support looks an awful lot like the kind of personalised professional development that educators were asking for during the EdTechBridge chat

As someone on the EdTech side of the bridge, Scott Freschet from Actively Learn highlighted that he wasn't sure if he could articulate what PD was. However, if this term was translated to "Delivering the Whole Product" he most certainly would, but then educators might not...

"Edu/Tech translator to the Education isle please... Customer waiting." couldn't resist. 


So here's a lesson on the "The Whole Product," how it should work, why it doesn't always pan out the way it should... and the implications for PD. 


Differentiation: Selling the Vision Vs Developing the Whole Product
OK, so a company has managed to get an educators attention and hopefully in a welcome way: from a referral or some inbound marketing... but maybe it was a particularly compelling unsolicited email or an engaging cold call.

You like what you hear and you arrange to meet up to discuss further. It's a compelling presentation from a young, ambitious and energetic start up. You're impressed with what you hear and decide to subscribe to the service.

But when the service is installed there's a gap between the service that you got and the solution that was presented by the EdTech rep. Is this a case of "Duped again by another unethical salesperson?"

Maybe, but are there really that many salespeople who go completely "off script" and deliver a presentation that has not been approved by their senior managers and/or guardians of the EdTech startups brand? Perhaps not...

The sales person will be selling what the company sees as their "vision" of how the service will develop... not what the Tech is like at the moment. 

"Theodore Levitt and Bill Davidow highlight that with new/emerging technology there can be gaps between the sales and marketing promise made to the customer and the actual product that gets shipped that would fulfil this promise. This is partly due to the sales team selling based on the “Whole Product” but this does not always get developed or delivered. Suppliers should be looking to deliver “The Whole Product” Geoffery Moore, Crossing the Chasm 

If we consider the product development during the early days of the PC, the actual product Vs the whole product might include:

1) Generic Product: A hard drive is shipped

 2) Expected Product:  Early PC users expected to get a monitor with their purchase – how else were they able to use the computer? But in fact, in most cases, it was not part of the generic product.

3) Augmented Product: A variety of products - software, games, printers– are developed. Customer hotlines, advanced training and local service centers crop up.

4) Potential Product: In edtech today topical issues are MOOCs and, since the TED Prize – Sugata Mirta’s S.O.L.E & A School in the Cloud


The ability to deliver the Whole Product solution goes through stages. When collaborating with clients on early pilot projects these development partners will assist with “the whole product”. Once the product is established third party suppliers will help to flesh out the whole product. The most crucial point is when companies are “crossing the chasm,” which is making the transition from having a handful of tech enthusiasts and early adopters to a more risk averse and conservative group of customers.  

During this awkward phase of product development there is no hope of any external support. If a supplier neglects the whole product and simply leaves the customer with the service, they are leaving their customer’s success to chance, and so, are giving up control over their product’s success. But if suppliers can think through their customer’s problems—and solutions—they can work to ensure that customers get “the whole product”.

So companies who sold tech that lost out in the race for the mass market - 8 track cassettes, laser discs, palm pilots - would have sold "The Whole Product" and what they expected would happen but didn't because 3rd party suppliers rallied round CD's, DVDs and Mobile phones.

Mind the Gap... In PD
I'm not an educator so I don't know if there is any correlation between the need for PD with products that were sold as being able to do XYZ, but it either doesn't have the expected functionality or, if it does it is far from intuitive.

If this is the case then it may have less to do with PD and more to do with the EdTech supplier doing as Moore highlights;

"They are leaving their customer’s success to chance, and so, are giving up control over their product’s success" 

The issues is not a Technical... It's the Culture
As usual this is not a development issue but a cultural one... one where suppliers take the time to think through their customer’s problems... visiting the classroom and seeing students and staff use the product and see where they are having challenges and functions that are laborious. It is a culture of collaboration and a commitment to educators that will ensure that EdTech's customers will get “the whole product.”

But even if the tech product does deliver the "Whole Product" no tech tool, or Professional Development course, will be effective if the culture is not right. 

What's the point of having tech that provides a great way to offer staff feedback... if there is a fundamental breakdown in communications? 

What's the point of going on a PD course about being a change agent or embracing technology... if admins are risk averse technophobes?   


I don't know about you but I find these variables way too complex... I find it's so much easier just to blame it on the sales guy ;)

If you agree with this post then get in touch with Steve Isaacs (@Mr_Isaacs) to discuss his ideas for Educators and EdTech collaborating on Professional Development.